Bill Tilden: The Flawed Life of a Gay Tennis Icon

As Wimbledon commences, viewers and readers will be entertained by inspiring stories of champions who overcame tragedy or heartbreak to raise the silver cup or plate.  Condemned to the shadows, however, are those who reversed the journey, descending from triumph to shame and obscurity.

Within that roll rests Bill Tilden, three-time Wimbledon champion (1920, 1921, 1930).  His homosexuality was known but not discussed during the 1920s, the decade he dominated tennis.  But when he died in 1953, he was shadowed by two jail terms for sexual activities involving underage boys.

Even before his arrest, Tilden had been consigned to the shadows.  An icon like Babe Ruth – whose peccadilloes were protected by the New York sports media – could be celebrated until his death.  But for Tilden, whose tennis primacy during the Jazz Age 1920s was followed by a retirement during a much more conservative and moralistic era, the celebrations were few.

After he was arrested in November 1946 and January 1949, the story was over, for most sportswriters and fans.  Tilden would die alone in June 1953.  The Associated Press would vote him the top tennis player of the first half of the 20th century, but it seemed more of a sad contrast with what Tilden’s life had become.

But he didn’t go away quietly.  Rare among athletes of his time, Tilden actually wrote a statement about his sexual identity.  Between his two arrests, in 1948, he published an autobiography, “My Story.”  Toward the end of the book, in only two pages (pp. 307-309), Tilden addressed the issue.

The idea seems an act of public relations suicide seen only in the age of Twitter.  But Tilden was as confident in his writing abilities as he was in his serve as a player.  He was not a child tennis prodigy who became a world champion; Tilden in fact entered the tennis spotlight relatively late, in his mid-20s.  Before then, he was a writer and reporter for the Philadelphia Evening Ledger.  At his tennis peak, he successfully syndicated his articles to newspapers and magazines, earning $25,000 a year.

Tilden did not use a ghostwriter in the 1920s; nor did he use one here.  The words are his own, and he never lacked confidence in his ability to get himself out of trouble – whether on Center Court or the front page.  He believed he could take on society’s hostility toward his homosexuality as successfully as he dispatched opponents, even down match point.

The result, however, was not nearly as successful.  Courageously for a gay man in postwar America, Tilden starts by acknowledging his “condition” and claims, “History further demonstrates that in frequent instances creative, useful and even great human beings have known such relationships.”  He even speculates that homosexuality would be more likely within athletics, given its emphasis on “physical perfection.”  He boldly states, “Greater tolerance and wider education on the part of the general public concerning this form of sex relationship is one of the crying needs.”

Those comments, however, are followed by a change in rhetorical strategy, in which Tilden seems to adopt the rhetoric of his age.  He uses terms like “condition” and refers to a “psychoneurosis or other psychological disturbance” that he blames for his act.  Rather than “degeneracy,” he refers to “an illness; in most cases a psychological illness.”

But was he referring to his homosexuality, or the situation that led to his arrest?  Unfortunately, it’s difficult to distinguish from his writing.  Throughout the section that follows this one in the book, Tilden’s description of his first imprisonment call to mind the “rehab” current celebrities seek when caught in moral or personal humiliation.  He declared himself refreshed and ready to resume his life and tennis.

This part of his autobiography leaves the reader confused.  But sadly, throughout his life, Tilden was not as good a writer as he fancied.  When the topic was tennis, he wrote with a flair that engaged his reader.  But his forays into fiction and drama were much less successful.  As Frank DeFord noted in his excellent biography, “His tennis fiction was forced and trite, but his writings about the playing of the game, however technical, read smoothly and even with a certain grace.”  Like most athletes, Tilden squandered his money, but in his case the money was lavished on productions of his own plays, which closed quickly.

In this case, as well, his contradictory approach would leave the reader confused.  Likely his editors would be reluctant to work too hard at cleaning up the section, leaving it to Tilden and his tortured prose.  But even within the section you can still see his center court combativeness, challenging the reader to confront a culture and phenomenon that would emerge defiantly in the coming decades.

In reviewing the book, Time magazine avoided the topic of sexual identity, but allowed itself thinly veiled jabs at Tilden.  The brief review was titled “Catty Reminisces,” and focused on Tilden’s uncomplimentary remarks toward contemporaries and more recent players.  The reviewer dismissed him as “an arrogant and unblushing showoff” and particularly noted Tilden’s “cattiest” description of Suzanne Lenglen, one of the top women players of the 1920s: “Her costume struck me as a cross between a prima donna’s and that of a street walker.”

The review concluded with Tilden’s plea that, even approaching age 60, he was ready to embark on another pro tour, “if the public will have me.”  But the public and the tennis establishment would have none of Tilden.  In his hometown of Philadelphia, he was expelled from the Germantown Cricket Club, and the University of Pennsylvania removed his name from the alumni files.  When friends discovered his body in his small Southern California apartment, his bags were packed and he was ready to leave for a tennis exhibition – his life and his sporting career ending together.

Tilden might not draw much attention during this year’s Wimbledon.  In fairness, he skipped the tournament between 1922 and 1926, though three wins in six tries left him with an overall singles record of 31-3, winning more than 90% of his matches.  His record in what is now the U.S. Open (seven titles) and Davis Cup were even more impressive.

But in today’s sports culture, as more high-profile athletes come out, it provides another reason to revisit Bill Tilden – a champion who, both in his playing style and lifestyle – was born too soon, discussed sexual identity too early, and has been buried too deeply for too long.

Real Professors of Auburn University

First published by The War Eagle Reader. You can link to that here.

The origins of those national headlines about A.J. McCarron and Katherine Webb’s wedding being a reality show?  My 2 p.m. Reporting class, I suspect.

First, some background.

This semester, Laurie Webb, Katherine’s sister, has been in the above class.  To avoid sounding like Brent Musberger, I will limit my comments to saying she is competent, talented, and diligent.  The equal of most of our PR and journalism students.  (I mean, she and they all got past our Journalism 1100 class, right?)

The first time she talked with me after class was about a student friend of hers, a fellow yoga instructor, who had apparently committed suicide.  We talked about knowing when a friend was struggling, what can be done to help — I had more than one such conversation that week.  The student’s death was a jolt.

Side note: It was either during that, or a conversation soon after, that we were talking football, and Laurie said, “It’s crazy. My sister dates a guy from the University of Alabama, and … ”  I basically replied, We know, Laurie; we know.

Right after spring break, I got an e-mail from Laurie in which she told me that she would be missing class that Friday, because A.J. had invited the family down to Gulf Shores.  He would be asking Katherine to marry him, and he wanted both families.

I suppose I could have broken the story and tweeted the news, but I held off for a couple of reasons.  One is that Laurie asked me to keep it a secret, because it was going to be a surprise.  Second is that I use my Twitter for sports media discussion and updates on journalism (and other topics) at Auburn.  A breathless note of rumored nuptials between A.J. and K-Webb — not me.

The Monday after the engagement news broke, I will confess a moment of weakness.  I asked Laurie to talk a little about the engagement.  After all, it was Reporting class, and she had witnessed a news event.  While talking about it, she mentioned that the engagement had been filmed as part of a planned reality show.

That bit of info elicited a collective groan from the class, to be honest.  But it also got the attention of the Auburn Plainsman staff members in the class.

After class, I thanked Laurie for being a good sport about it.  She accepted my appreciation with typically casual grace, adding that it had definitely been a crazy year for the family. Understatement No. 2.

The next Tuesday, I had walked over to the Plainsman office to eat lunch, as I do from time to time.  The staff members there told me they had interviewed Laurie and her family about the reality show.

They posted the story on their Web site the next day, and, of course, the fan was hit and 100 percent of a certain nether region broke loose.

The situation left me with a sinking feeling.  Had I let a student down?  Did my prodding cause her to let slip information that she would later regret?  Even if she did so willingly, the reflection of a gracious attitude, I would not blame her before I blamed myself.

It’s one of the complicating factors of being a journalism professor — when the conversations with students trickle over into the pond of interesting news.  Yes, I know news when I hear it.  But as a professor, often I have to keep that news to myself.

Not just student news.  I served as a faculty member on Auburn’s Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics (yes, CIA) for three years.  During that time, I heard things that were interesting — though never earth-shattering and certainly never scandalous.

We got Auburn’s APR numbers and drug testing statistics a few weeks ahead of the general public.  And we were briefed on ESPN the Magazine’s story highlighting Dakota Mosley’s allegations that Auburn did not respond adequately to his drug problem.

In all cases, I kept quiet about what I heard, as requested (though I did talk a lot about how impressed I was with Cassie Arner, who served as Auburn’s contact with Shaun Assael of ESPN).

In this situation, Laurie caught grief for her part in the story, as did The Plainsman, because the producers were not ready to release the news. So as I walked into Reporting the next day, I wondered if it would be awkward.

But it wasn’t. Laurie attended, and in talking about it afterward, she seemed quite relaxed, despite the drama.  I agreed with her.  To me, this wasn’t Survivor; we know the ending. No reason to keep everything a secret.

At the same time, I felt compelled to apologize to Laurie for putting her in the middle of the story.  She shrugged it off, and seemed sincere.  But the situation still bothers me.

Is my line drawn in the right place? Does it still give too much ground to the journalism side of me?  Is it better to keep the line there and deal with the occasional doubts, instead of instinctively hiding what should be reported?

It’s yet another teaching moment — the kind that the news media provide on a daily basis — and I have talked to my students about it.  Sometimes, however, the most important, and sometimes uncomfortable lessons, are for me.

Why I Hate Oversigning

First published in the Crystal Ball Run blog. Link to it here.

I don’t hate oversigning because it seems to be a staple of SEC recruiting strategies — I mean, Tennessee … 34? Really?

I hate it because it is the worst example of how college football subverts and overwhelms the purpose of a university — for the goal of winning.

Every CFB coach faces this.  Combine the limit of 25 scholarships per year and 85 overall with the frequent redshirting that extends possible player tenures to five years, and even the worst math student can see that the number will shoot past 85.

Even with all the sources of attrition — disabling injuries, academic casualties, discipline decisions, transfers in search of more playing time, early NFL exits and, oh yes, exhausted eligibility — coaches frequently end up with potentially more players than they have slots for.  What to do?

Many coaches avoid the issue by recruiting to 85, even if it means not bringing in a full cohort of 25 per year, to stress their commitment to the players.  Any scholarship attrition between National Signing Day and fall practice is used to reward walk-ons.

Others, like Saban, recruit to the full limit, throw in a couple of “grayshirts” whose scholarships are delayed, and then reduce the scholarship roster through a variety of tactics — including those listed above, regardless of whether they apply appropriately.  Some years it’s not needed; other years it’s needed a lot.  As one Bama fan pointed out, this is definitely one of those years for Saban.

To a sports media pack protecting a narrative, the result tidily fits the “relentless success machine.”  As is too often the case, they ignore the process (Yes, I see what I did there) and the students it affects.

But this is not the NFL.  Football has chosen to locate its developmental league on college campuses, and both the media and the colleges promote every possible dollar out of the arrangement.  So pull away from the fruit-bearing trees and see the forest here: A college/university.

Once a college football or basketball program needs to chase away excess human capital by a variety of explicit and implicit means, it diminishes the educational institution that hosts its facilities.

Some use the analogy of how academic scholarships require that students maintain a certain grade-point average.  But that is not an accurate analogy.

It would be more like our journalism faculty meeting every year to decide which junior and senior majors to ease out, so that we can accept a more promising crop of newcomers.  (Don’t worry, students. We don’t.)

Of course, we allow all of our majors who maintain a graduation-level GPA to remain in the program, and we do our part to teach and develop them — and hope to God the light comes on, in some cases.

College football and basketball programs should do the same.  They owe it not only to the athletes who lack a coach’s options after they sign a scholarship, but also to the universities that educate thousands of students besides those who compete.

Others point out that, particularly at Alabama, hardly any football players publicly protest after being eased out.  But a system is not right because the student-athletes do not complain about it.

Colleges often do things that diminish their mission, and students don’t complain about it.  The over-reliance on poorly paid and protected part-time instructors comes to mind.  Just because students don’t notice or complain does not make the practice right.

As a former faculty athletics committee member, I do recognize that other sports function under different scholarship levels — they cannot provide full scholarships to an entire roster — so the management of scholarships is handled differently.

But let’s not allow the deluge-ional revenue available through football and basketball to cloud the mission of a university.  I cheer these athletes from the stands, but I also teach them and others from the classroom.  It happens.

I hope that Gus Malzahn does not oversign.  If he does, I will speak out against the practice, regardless of how many championships or bazillions of simoleons he brings to the university.

But our mission as university faculty is to add to the base of knowledge through research and to pass this knowledge along to the next generations.  Call me corny, but to me, that is the treasure of the university — the students who fill our campuses.

Let’s not reduce some to the means to an end, just because they profit a coach, a campus, its fans and the sports media.

John Carvalho is an associate professor of journalism at Auburn University.  A former sports magazine editor, he summoned enough focus to complete a Ph.D. at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  He tweets about sports media issues at johncarvalhoau.  While he does not believe in oversigning, his students believe he over-grades.